IMCDb Forum
Delete a Message
Reason of removal (sent to the user)

Do you really want to delete this message?  


Sandie
The difference with Reliant from Hooper was that it was clearly used in branding and sometimes badging in the same way as MCW was:
http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb428/JohnSandie/ReliantBrochure_zpsnlnavzit.jpg
http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb428/JohnSandie/89-91Reliant_zpshslgzfbr.jpg

In comparison, going over the later Metrocab brochure there is no reference to Hooper other than the page posted above saying Metrocab (UK) LTD was a member of the Hooper group of companies. It's not that the Hooper period was a short or inconsequential one, just that it seems to be the wrong name for it and that these ones should have Metrocab as make.

All the Reliants (save for: http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_747057-Reliant-Metrocab-1990.html which could just as easily be an MCW) are also confirmed, solid identifications by plate info or badging which I think supports their retention. The few errors I have spotted are with ones listed as MCW and Hooper but I still have more checking to do and I think it's worth sorting the naming convention before getting on to the cleaning (and anyway, like with the Reliants, all of the Hoopers with years - by either plate or visible details - are already rock solid IDs).

So I'm arguing for a) but with Metrocab (already used for the Kamkorp ones) replacing Hooper per the brochure and then a little bit of b).
Sign In  :: Sign Up  :: Lost your login or your password?
KelCommunity.be :: © 2004-2020 Akretio SPRL :: Powered by Kelare