Merging required : http://imcdb.org/vehicle_1041131.html

As previously said, you're admin, you can do it like me

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1041466
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1041362
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1041368


generic
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1041340


a slight MIS-ID
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=586003

and an Outlaw is already listed

duplicate entry

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1041946

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1039735
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=564385
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=863761
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=920072
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1041245
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1041649
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1041450
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=610992
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1042028
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=32082

think it's solved but isn't it too background ???
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1034901.html


http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1036706.html

http://imcdb.org/vehicle_1043110.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1042787

pic replacements and some were ID
http://imcdb.org/movie.php?id=92402

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1018441-Club-Car.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_942977-Club-Car.html

But I don't know, by merging two entries, what to do with the entry that will be deleted. Is the picture also automatically deleted from the database ? Or if not, do I put that picture in a comment ? How do I do that ? I have no idea.

BK362 is a Nissan Diesel RP252NSNRN not RP210N.
Bodywork is by FHI is right. RP252NSNRN is very
similar to RP210N...

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1043067

Please update first register year...

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1040837

sorry, this is a Asia M I bodied Volvo B7R...

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1040868

Wong Ming bodied Hino RK176K:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1042917

Toyota U10 Coaster:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1042102

Yes, if you delete an entry, the picture will be deleted, so you have to save it first.

Save as a thumbnail (store pictures on the site), add to the comments of the one being kept. Don't forget to save any thumbnails in the comments or important comments with it. Once that is done, delete the entry.

Indeed, pic is deleted so you need to submit it as new "comment picture", either copy the image address and provide it in the second field of the "upload picture for comments" window, or else save it locally and upload it normally like a pic you made.

And for copying comments, the easiest is to click the "quote" icon, copy the whole text with quote tags, and paste that into the comments of the "target" vehicle. To be repeated for each comment (so easier to handle that with multiple tabs open).

Not to forget to mention with the pic put in comments: episode number and/or timetag, if there are any (and role if different than the existing page).

For such merges, if one page is much older (much lower vehicle number in the page address) it is better to keep the oldest page, as it may already be referenced elsewhere (on the site or outside).
Sometimes in such cases if the to-be-deleted page has a better pic or a higher rating, I swap the pictures, adjust the info (role, episode, etc.)

If it seems too complicated you can still let other admins do it, but if you feel OK doing it, that may help fighting against the many duplicates that must exist on the site (or some background ones that should be regrouped once identified).

I've never uploaded anything on IMCDb, so yes, it sounds complicated.

Here's another duplicate entry :

http://imcdb.org/vehicle_1043792-MAN.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_1043808.html

In this case, should we keep the "just half of the cab is visible" pic as a thumbnail or simply delete it ?

In this case, as both are the same age, the one that should stay is http://imcdb.org/vehicle_1043792-MAN.html
As it has a bigger role and a better pic
So http://imcdb.org/vehicle_1043808.html can be put in comments, just for reference, as it may have another role even if it is the same truck.

Is it me, or is this just a bicycle ? http://imcdb.org/vehicle_747806.html

There's already an entry for the moped next to it.

probably, and anyway I doubt that would be identifiable...
moved to comments

Wrong episode number

http://imcdb.org/vehicle_305039-Volkswagen-Golf-Typ-17-1981.html

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=771084
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1045708
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=345174

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1046328
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=922525

Just a question here, you might want to edit this:

http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=863983

An ambulance built back into a stock van is an ambulance or a van? I mean, some ambulances started their life as a van or motorhome. However this "van" has a circular shape over the windshield (thats where the blue lights are), indicating a stock ambulance turned into a van.

Van -> Ambulance or
Ambulance -> Van

And what do we list this? I think motorhome is wrong. When i added that vehicle, i was only thinking about the air vents which are not necessary on a van. But if this is a conversion its more likely an old ambulance without stickers.

The intended rule was ambulance = modified body (could be a base van, wagon or sedan) ; but if it is the base body with just ambulance stickers and lights, then it can be listed in its "base" category.
Same for firetrucks: that's a truck built for a special purpose, with either ladder, pumps, etc. A simple red van or SUV used by firemen is not a firetruck

Should be regrouped with http://imcdb.org/vehicle_694273-Volkswagen-LT-Typ-28.html if it is an ambulance, I suppose... (that's what you meant by "obsolete"?)