I regrouped both since they seem identical

Some Ladas where a model year change is due:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=926623
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=671181
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=350459
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=424344
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=780626

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1096204.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1096205.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1096036
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=711256
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1096008
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1096023
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=604018
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=603269
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1096007-Ford.html

White Road Xpeditor. Not a Road Xpeditor II:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1089967

I was going to post a link on it, that somebody posted already, but it doesn't seem so safe right now.

Well you could simply comment on the page too

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1096795-Chevrolet.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1096037
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=717889

2 stars
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1097384
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1097489-Cadillac-Sedan-DeVille-1989.html

3 stars

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_969270-Cadillac-Catera-1997.html

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1095764.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1097541
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1097667.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1097659.html



http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1097782.html


http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1097585

The city of Sarajevo has only 2003 model years of this type of bus:

http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=800333

this looks like a remote mine clearer so dunno why the admins validated it or even didn't put it in comments
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1096758.html



http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1098529.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1098444.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1098613
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1098551.html

Not everyone has knowledge of these unusual vehicles, so we approve them so other members can help us ID. If it is not worthy of being listed, fine. No need to be passive-aggressive with us. We are allowed to make mistakes.

Is gabrimium correct? He's not the best when it comes to accuracy.

indeed, that's not a missed comment but just something pending confirmation

Sorry but dont you admins check those IDs if you dont trust people? I mean a quick look at Google tells me that this is indeed a Subaru R2. I know this car from a video game so i was also sure without looking.

Edit: Oh i guess Baube did check it. What you said here confused me.

Sometimes we rather wait for someone else to confirm or deny it
Also, just looking at pictures can be dangerous: identical cars with different name depending on the trim/version/country/etc.

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1099977.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1099996.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1099989-Pontiac.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1099986-Pontiac-GTO-1968.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1099990-Ford.html (C-Series)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1099980-Ford-F-100.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1099982-Chevrolet-C-10-1969.html (1968)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1096217 (1984 Dodge Diplomat)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1097354 (1978 Pontiac Catalina)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1097368
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1097386
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=356013
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=237856 - delete
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1098069
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=867063 (Dodge Monaco by default)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1023322
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_77984-Dodge-Colt-1979.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1046145
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1042446 - can't be ID'd apparently, delete
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1090171 - also impossible to ID I guess
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1098511 (1980 Pontiac Bonneville Safari)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1098750.html - no one ID it, delete
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1098537 (1971 Toyota Corolla)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1098781 (C/K-Series)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_929420-Chevrolet-Chevy-Van.html (replace)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_929407-Lincoln-Continental-Mark-V-1977.html (replace)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_929408-Plymouth-Duster-1971.html (replace)
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=637130
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1091503
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1093656

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1099323
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1099977
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1098376
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1100585
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1100509.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=970847
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1098670
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1099750
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1099169
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1097977
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1099035

duplicate
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1087352.html

Both are 2-star vehicles, so deleting them won't help: be sure people will later add them again.
I always wonder about this urge to delete unidentifiable vehicles: what's wrong with having unknown vehicles in the database? The fact that nobody managed to identify them for now doesn't mean nobody will ever.