Normally i would have said nothing because i thought anyone would see it but those are still unchanged.

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=320185 not by any chance a facelift model. 1992+ model year.

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=61045 Aftermarket headlights doesnt make it a Facelift Model. 1992+ model year. It also has 1992-1997 hubcaps btw.

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=762826 All cop cars are LXi trim line.

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_273935-Eagle-Vision-1993.html Some admin missunderstood me. Main pic IS a Chrysler Concorde. Only the last two thumbs (which i quoted) in khaosths post show a Eagle Vision.

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_273581-Chrysler-LHS-1994.html + http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_273931-Chrysler-LHS-1994.html can be merged together. There is no need to have two pages for the same model with the same star rating.

Indeed these were missed

For the LHS, I merged the two on the 2nd link, as that main pic was better, and added other ones to your comment.

This is an E 200:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=727756

The Series was sponsored by Mercedes-Benz and all pictures on that page show the same car used by Hagen Dahlberg.

Oh and this page needs a replacement for the main picture. I also think the one star car is too much background and could be deleted but thats your decision:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_746301-Mercedes-Benz-C-Klasse-W202-1994.html

the car seen through a wire fence? It is perfectly visible, how would that be "too background"?
Or were the pics already changed?
As the main pic has the same plate as the additional images, it is the same car I guess.

yes, someone already changed it.

You are quite active at this time of day.

I don't hang about.

This is only one star: http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_746975-Chrysler-Voyager-1996.html

I thought it was 2 stars first, but then i noticed that in the second scene it was a different car model. In an overall shot both cars are seen.

This Jeep CJ-5 has a lower case "j" in the name:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=790880
It should be upper case.

I am afraid this gets lost in the Myriads of Cobra 11 comments. A rare sight is this bus:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_159882-Neoplan-N-4014-NF.html

Its a BVG bus but a rare one. BVG is the federal bus company of Berlin and Alarm für Cobra 11 was filmed in Berlin at the time the episode was made.

So usually in Berlin movies and television series we get the normal stuff: MAN and Mercedes. But in this particular case we see a 2nd Generation Neoplan N 4014 NF built by Neoplan in 1992. The second generation had MAN engines (1st generation with Deutz engines) and a different front design.

This bus is in fact a 1992 Neoplan N 4014 NF (NF = "Niederflur"). Vehicle number must be between 1001 and 1010.

Another "error" here:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=529006#Comment1733563

The N 4014 NF has bigger air outtakes at the end of the side because they used MAN engines instead of the Deutz engines. I have found out that the cologne bus company had only 1991-1993 model year busses.

So this is a 1991+ model year.

*bump* The Neoplan busses above still need a change.

And we came to the conclusion that this is an US model Dodge Mini-Ram Van (NOT Made for EU):

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_795964-Plymouth-Voyager.html

Exactly the same car was also used in "Die Straßen von Berlin" and also needs to be changed. But we need more shots from my "friend" Gamer to confirm it. As it is 3 stars i hope he has.

US model; not made for EU

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=789294#Comment1742472

For http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=529006#Comment1733563 you should contact S 415 GT directly if you wish to know why he identified it as such.

The two links for Chrysler/Plymouth vans are comments from yesterday, not yet missed so, me or another admin would probably have seen them in the next hours.
Or else, if things are really missed (usually after 24h, or Monday evening for things posted on the weekend) they should rather be reported in the "Not-unidentified" thread in the general section

Sorry i didn't meant to rush

I just thought if i bump these buses i can also remind you of those interesting and in Germany rare Dodge Vans.

Maybe already discussed? Could the 1951 default model year given to the Simca 9 Aronde be wrong?
According to Wikipedia, and confirmed at least here (fr),
The first Aronde debuted in the spring of 1951 but initially only a few hundred pre-production cars were distributed to carefully selected "guinea-pig" buyers, and the full production version was finalised only in time for the Paris Motor Show, becoming available for sale in October 1951.

Doesn't it mean that the 1952 MY would be more accurate?

The picture says it all: http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=58696

New tip, but it's not about the make and model of a vehicle. It's about the way an episode of a TV series is formatted. There should be a period rather than a comma.

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_814827.html

I'm pretty sure I've been guilty of those typos myself.

I fixed a few others in the database at the same time, less than 50 amongst the 740 000 entries, that's still low

Some also use that to separate multiple episode numbers (even if it is only supposed to indicate the episode of the captures, other episodes can then be mentioned in comments)

Why do some 1989+ Toyota Hilux have the N60 code while this latter was apparently only given to the 1983-88 models? Was a mix made between N60 and N160 for the 1997-2005 models?
And what about the N70 code, also said in WP to be for the 1983-88 models too, but only given to the 2005-15 models in the IMCDb?

I can't help on that, except doing changes if needed

What do you think to rename all the Lancia Beta with its correct symbol β? They're even badged in this way:



I've renamed one as example: http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=342267 (I will edit it like it was if the renaming will not be accepted)

They are commonly known as "Beta", I think it is better to keep that for referencing purpose and because it is easier to type for people
The Y is listed as Y (from our alphabet) instead of the greek Υ which looks nearly identical but is actually another character.