20/05/2016 @ 20:20:56: tore-40: Incorrect spelling/listing
I stand corrected, if I've mixed up the words topic/thread/post then I now know better. Yet there is no need to make me look like an a**, thank you, I'm capable of that myself, if that is my goal. I did notice the 17 other pages filled with comments. Or, with posts, if you prefer.
For the cars, I feel you should keep Pickup/Pritschenwagen (or whatever local name) for the first years, for 1963+ you could use Doka/Crew Cab/Double Cab as a seperate model. Please note, this should not be an issue just for the German cars.
20/05/2016 @ 21:13:35: antp: Incorrect spelling/listing
Yet there is no need to make me look like an a**, thank you, I'm capable of that myself, if that is my goal. I did notice the 17 other pages filled with comments. Or, with posts, if you prefer.
I don't think that was the purpose of his reply. I also first misinterpreted your post, but didn't comment as I was unsure (I guessed you meant "
does the question apply to VW, German vehicles or to all vehicles?")
25/05/2016 @ 00:34:38: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
My apologies, my point wasn't to make you look like anything/anyone special. I was really tired that day and should obviously not have tried any kind of humor, even if I really thought it inconsequential and without any preconceived idea, at that time...
[...] I feel you should keep Pickup/Pritschenwagen (or whatever local name) for the first years, for 1963+ you could use Doka/Crew Cab/Double Cab as a seperate model. [...]
Despite the
1960 document showing also the
Doppelkabine name?
[...]Please note, this should not be an issue just for the German cars.
I didn't dig for the non-German
Dokas for now, so let's have it on the todo list
25/05/2016 @ 19:05:27: antp: Incorrect spelling/listing
It is just one document?
It is not like all advertisings/catalogues were using that name
26/05/2016 @ 04:30:08: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
Pritschenwagen mit... for the 1961 & 1962 models without problem, but I am still somewhat divided over the 1960 model year, as I found 2 documents using the 2 contradictory ways of calling the
Doka (see the concerned post)
Let's make it
Pritschenwagen mit... for 1960 (by default), 1961 and 1962, and
Doppelkabine only for the following years?
At least for the German models: the few I saw while searching German literature led me to think that the logic of the sales names was different in some other languages.
26/05/2016 @ 09:41:10: antp: Incorrect spelling/listing
I think it will be easier to do that, it is already complicated enough with the change of name in 63, no need a different one just for 60
05/08/2016 @ 03:46:08: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
Known for now as VéloSoleX
2200 and
3300 in the IMCDb, these mopeds should apparently have an
S in front of their model name:
No change needed for the predecessors (
1400,
1700 & co.) nor for the successors (
3800,
5000...), however:
05/08/2016 @ 17:24:29: antp: Incorrect spelling/listing
done
06/08/2016 @ 04:52:38: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
Thanks!
19/08/2016 @ 04:40:56: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
Why are
these 27 Jeeps identified as "
Universal", with their model name (
CJ-x) used as model/chassis code? A remnant of the beginning of the IMCDb?
19/08/2016 @ 09:52:43: antp: Incorrect spelling/listing
Good question. Possibly it is indeed like how were listed cars like "Chevrolet Custom [C-10]"
However the naming of Jeep was not very clear for older models at some times.
Jeep was not always really the make, and the CJ-something was not always mentioned as model name, Universal was the civilian name.
cf discussion on
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=247391
22/08/2016 @ 06:31:42: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
I was already aware of the "make problem", and had similar discussions with 4x4peru on other pages... Does anyone mind if I "reallocate" these pages to the corresponding categories?
22/08/2016 @ 17:33:01: antp: Incorrect spelling/listing
Do as you think it is the best
23/08/2016 @ 00:59:21: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
I'll try not to wreak (too) huge havoc in the Db
30/08/2016 @ 02:37:35: Reg1992: Incorrect spelling/listing
03/09/2016 @ 19:58:31: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
[...] Does anyone mind if I "reallocate" these pages to the corresponding categories?
Done!
I took the opportunity to clean a bit the
Brazilian models. See
here for explanations about the name
(Willys without
Overland,
Jeep without
CJ-5) and the possible model years (1955 or 1962).
The single
1966 identification is due to
bob dieck, but the linked "source" is a forum in which the contributors seem more to say that they're unsure of it, for me... Should we really keep this MY?
09/10/2016 @ 07:45:09: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
About Volvo's US truck division:
The Volvo White company (1981 to 1987) sold apparently its vehicles as White trucks, so nothing has to be changed for them:
But the vehicles from the 1988-96 division (Volvo GM Heavy Truck corporation) were promoted as
WHITEGMC models, not as White/GMC like done for now
in the IMCDb. Shouldn't we use the same way of writing?
| | |
1988 WhiteGMC Aero Series - Brochure cover | 1991 Truck line - Detail of the brochure cover | 1993 WhiteGMC Conventional Aero - Brochure cover |
(Click...)
| |
(August) 1992 WhiteGMC WG64 - Parts book - Cover detail | 1992 WhiteGMC ACM-ACL Series - Operator's manual - Cover detail |
Or, as that could sound like a lot of capital letters,
WhiteGMC?
09/10/2016 @ 11:48:38: antp: Incorrect spelling/listing
On Wikipedia they mention "Volvo WhiteGMC" as make, but we could indeed use "WhiteGMC" rather than "White/GMC". The "/" was maybe added because there is a big one on the grille
16/10/2016 @ 04:21:21: eLMeR: Incorrect spelling/listing
The "/" was maybe added because there is a big one on the grille
On Wikipedia they mention "Volvo WhiteGMC" as make, but we could indeed use "WhiteGMC" rather than "White/GMC".
Volvo WhiteGMC was never used as make, I'm afraid that the WP page is another one written without checking...
But as the brochures show indeed
Volvo and
WhiteGMC together (but usually with WhiteGMC at first, see the pictures in the previous post), this could explain the mistake...
The accurate company name was
Volvo GM Heavy Truck Corparation, and the 2 makes sold by it were
Volvo and
WhiteGMC:
(Both pictures are excerpts from the 1988 truck line brochure)