04/01/2014 @ 00:40:06: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Google has deactivated ads from the site, mentioning that it contains Pornographic/Nude pictures.
However they do not provide a relevant URL...
Anyway, to avoid future problems, if you find nude pics (in comments or even maybe vehicle picture), it would be nice to report them here so I can eventually remove them, as I prefer to have Google's money than having a few random nude pics provided by Sixcyl and others.
Also, to reactivate ads I have to provide a few URLs to Google where such pics were removed.
04/01/2014 @ 01:24:01: antp: Nude pics vs Google
1st link : pics are useless (not even pretty
), I think, so they could simply be removed
2nd link : maybe just use the thumbnail picture as main picture, so the nude pic can also simply be removed.
04/01/2014 @ 04:53:56: owlman: Nude pics vs Google
04/01/2014 @ 05:06:32: night cub: Nude pics vs Google
04/01/2014 @ 11:38:19: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Wow that's a lot of results
Thanks for the search
I'll check these later
04/01/2014 @ 19:11:42: Love Krittaya: Nude pics vs Google
04/01/2014 @ 22:51:25: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Thanks for the lists.
I deleted the pics completely unrelated from the site from comments (i.e. actresses pictures) and so that were useless.
For the moment, I do not yet delete those which also show cars, that'll be if really we do not have choice; they could still be censored then.
05/01/2014 @ 13:17:39: 130rapid: Nude pics vs Google
It's worth to add some kind of 'Don't link close-to-nude photos, please' sentence to our Help/FAQ.
05/01/2014 @ 13:25:00: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Yes.
And I'll also censor the nude pics with cars by pixelating the nude contents. But I'll keep a backup of the original pictures, just in case of.
edit: I hesitate what to do for
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=7725 though...
However, some like
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=194002 or the ones from "The bodyguard" would still be acceptable I think (problem with Google and censorship is usually when butts, genitals or breasts are visible)
05/01/2014 @ 16:43:22: Ddey65: Nude pics vs Google
Does this have anything to do with the removal of bold text and links from my profile page?
05/01/2014 @ 17:29:00: antp: Nude pics vs Google
No, that's unrelated.
I made another change because when a profile contained too much text to parse it was quite heavy for the server. I'll increase the limit a little bit, as it seems that your profile is just above it.
05/01/2014 @ 21:57:19: mike962: Nude pics vs Google
06/01/2014 @ 00:19:47: chicomarx: Nude pics vs Google
^ that won't trigger anything. Google has some image recognition that's set to recognize boobs and other shapes in skin tone, not legs.
06/01/2014 @ 11:22:54: antp: Nude pics vs Google
I think that one is indeed still acceptable.
06/01/2014 @ 13:33:01: MisterZ: Nude pics vs Google
Do bare male bottoms count as nudity? I've uploaded maybe 2 that had bottoms visible.
06/01/2014 @ 13:43:45: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Depends how the are seen... if you can find the pages, post the links
06/01/2014 @ 16:46:46: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Google rejected the claim after a first cleaning, still not giving any example of what causes a problem.
No idea which page is concerned then, but if you notice some that should be cleaned it is still good to report them here.