I cleaned comments of 2nd one (useless for the site)
I guess that for the first one it should be pixelated then, though that it can hardly be considered as pornographic.
Americans are too prude

The message I got from Google was super vague, didn't include precise examples, and included these case examples :
- Pornography
-> full nudity scenes
-> pornographic images, videos or games
-> pornographic anime or cartoons
- Sexual contents
-> concealed nudity
-> transparent clothes
-> obscene or provocative posture
-> focused on breasts, bottoms or genitals
(rough translation, I got all that in French)

And no guarantee that removing some (or even all) will solve anything, since I do not know which page is concerned!

More boobs?
http://pics.imcdb.org/0is80/vorovskoiobschaktfileru.7674.jpg
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_290466-Citroen-Mehari-1975.html
http://pics.imcdb.org/0is84/vorovskoiobschaktfileru.7674.jpg
http://pics.imcdb.org/0is387/1021w.3927.jpg
http://pics.imcdb.org/0is132/bloodspatteredbride26xl5.1281.jpg

There are alternatives to Google Ads however.
http://www.latesttutorial.com/top-10-highest-paying-google-adsense-alternatives-in-2013/

I'll censor the Mehari page, that one is probably too much
I cleaned the comments containing the other pics.

Indeed there are alternatives, but usually they pay less (due to non-contextual ads) and many have more intrusive ads

Nudity maybe wasn't necessary, but litteral pornography there wasn't at this site for sure.
Anyway nude pics are not too hard to trace, I would worry more about the points under the "Sexual contents" - this can mean nearly everything!

What about swearwords in comments, is that forbidden? (God, I hope not)

They didn't complain about that, so for now I do not care... but everything is possible

Can us admins just edit nude pics out of comments rather than report them here? (would save work for you)

There is not so many editing, I prefer that all is done by myself (or by those who posted the pics), so there aren't arguing about someone complaining "another admin deleted my pics".
Also because at the same time I also clean the comments related to the pics.

Have you already been through sixcyl's contributions list?

Just a brief look through sixcyl's filmography reveals:

http://www.imcdb.org/movie_101026-¡Atame!.html (bloody hell! )
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_935030-24-mesures.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_94596-36-Fillette.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_1032846-4-luni,-3-saptamani-si-2-zile.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_46688-Ah!-Les-belles-bacchantes.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_78467-Violette-Noziere.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_215339-Vive-la-France.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_56663-Vivre-sa-vie--film-en-douze-tableaux.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_63787-Vixen!.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_1333667-When-You-re-Strange.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_446668-Volvo-PV-544-1959.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_75376-Up!.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_124185-Under-the-Skin.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_76851-Un-taxi-mauve.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_351914-Un-ete-americain.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_214238-Un-crime.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_191606-Un-chien-qui-rapporte.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_70852-Un-amour-de-pluie.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_157122-Trolosa.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_61647-Triple-Cross.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_200192-Trasgredire.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_70827-Traitement-de-choc.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_83219-Tout-feu,-tout-flamme.html

And possibly this: http://pics.imcdb.org/0ge25/253393-COM_EL.jpg

By the way I started from page 14 and went backwards, though I looked at a few on page 1.

How much is the salary, you usually earn due these advertises? If it's not too much, I would prefer, that we collect that money in our community. This is much more honorable for ourselves than creeping weepy in the dust, just for getting a few lousy bucks by these unworldly clowns from Overseas

Frankly spoken: this here:





is incredibly ridicoulous, pure idiotic Redneck-bullshit, especially the topic of "sexual contents"
Unwordly and annoying.

What would be my partial rate of the advert-money? Let me know and I will make the bank transfer immediately.
(btw: I've never ever clicked on one of those advertises, so in my case they are totally useless.)


P.S. If the Yankee-Googles may become more nuts, we can prepare to censor away also visible alcoholic beverages, people, who are drinking alcoholic beverages, smokers, tobacco products, even comments or words, which could be understood as
- s-related
- f-related
- racistic
- mysogynistic
etc.pp. ...blablabla ...

But to show the Nazi-flag, the swastica and the Hitler-salute, this is still o.k., because it's not against the US-law.
(but against the law in Germany. If I would show any of those three items in the public, I would be fined and maybe even prisoned)

P.S. Over here you even may be fined, if you wear Bundeswehr-jump-boots with white shoelaces. Because this is (rather was) one of the dresscodes of neonazis.

Legally I can't say in public what I earn via Google Adsence (yes, that's how strict they are), but anyway donations would not reach that each month I think.
About clicking ads, when there is a sufficient number of visitors it is possible to have ads paying per display rather than per click. Hence also why we want to improve the site to have more visitors, to have ads related to the contents (i.e. about movies or cars) which may also be more lucrative.

A little less than two months ago I made a test with another announcer, it seemed to earn less than Google but it would still be a solution if needed.



Yes but it is long.
Thanks for the links
(first one was indeed I wonder why I didn't censor it back then)

I do not think that kind would be a problem.
It is rather the genital/breast(/butt) area that scare them.

http://www.imcdb.org/yourcomments.php?archiveformovie=115814
Very fake, so not sure does it count.
Also deleted one or two "too provocative" extras from mine pics.

EDIT: Ah also I was reminded of this situation: http://www.imcdb.org/movie.php?id=194108 (in spoiler)
To re-think one more time, now in the Google context.

1st link: no reason for keeping that though
2nd link: as it is just from the trailer we could delete that one, and wait for a better one from the full movie (or a censored one)

What about men's bare bottoms?

I think those should be censored too, at least if well visible (like http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=446668 quite in foreground that I pixelated)

Some more from Sixcyl's list (working backwards again, did page 13 to page 10):

http://www.imcdb.org/movie_105622-Topazu.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_54389-Tirez-sur-le-pianiste.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_452624-The-Good-German.html
http://www.imcdb.org/yourcomments.php?archiveformovie=119164
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_309987-The-Dreamers.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_53740-The-Criminal.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_72200-Squadra-Volante.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_261311-Son-de-mar.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_1421051-Somewhere.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_114436-Showgirls.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_384533-She-Hate-Me.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_444418-Selon-Charlie.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_79872-Scusi,-lei-e-normale.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_69220-Sans-sommation.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_75163-Salon-Kitty.html (how tasteful! )
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_194314-Romance.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_72047-Puzzle.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_78111-Pretty-Baby.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_70559-Prenez-la-queue-comme-tout-le-monde.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_258013-Pays-de-cocagne.html (possible, see 3rd "bodies" pic)
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_86087-Pauline-a-la-plage.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_63414-Partner.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_64789-Paroxismus.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_67550-Papa,-les-petits-bateaux.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_388311-Or.html
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_56291-Noz-w-wodzie.html (possible, see 7th pic of girl)
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_97965-New-York-Stories.html (possible, I'm not sure how strict Google is)
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_101152-Nestor-Burma.html

What on Earth does that mean? Anyone wearing clothes?

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_654932-smart-Fortwo-450-2004.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_654019-Holden-Berlina-VY-2002.html