09/04/2014 @ 18:24:23: antp: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
They may some day be identified
You already reported these several times at different places of the site and the forum...
09/04/2014 @ 18:53:10: mike962: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
They may some day be identified
You already reported these several times at different places of the site and the forum...
but that's the point , there are 55 pages and growing with trucks which are very clearly visible including cabin then how are this gonna be ID ?
and those are juts some examples, I could probably list 2-3 pages of them
how this supposed to be ID if you see nothing of the actual truck ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_217919.html
what do the other members think ?
09/04/2014 @ 22:21:18: dsl: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
If something is noticeable in the film - even if 1* - it deserves a page, because someone somewhere sometime may wonder what it is. For me that over-rides identifiability - even the fact that we can not identify it despite best efforts is still better than omitting it. Putting things in comments (or merging if possible) may be appropriate on case-by-case decisions, but not just because they're only 1*.
10/04/2014 @ 00:41:27: DidierF: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
Hear, hear, dsl!
10/04/2014 @ 12:01:33: walter.: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
If this is not identifiable, then it must be deleted"
This would be what you're thinking, but again, it doesn't work that way here
once and for all.
10/04/2014 @ 12:04:06: antp: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
Well if there is really any chance to be identified, indeed it is probably not worth keeping on its page (and could be moved to comments).
But it happened previously that trucks were identified on basis of wheels, rear bumper, etc.
10/04/2014 @ 18:58:11: t0nkatracker: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
But it happened previously that trucks were identified on basis of wheels, rear bumper, etc.
exactly, just because we do not have the experts on the site yet, does not mean that contributions should be deleted. Especially if it is 2 star or more.
10/04/2014 @ 19:07:48: mike962: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
exactly, just because we do not have the experts on the site yet, does not mean that contributions should be deleted. Especially if it is 2 star or more.
and how exactly would even a hardcore expert figure this out ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_217919.html10/04/2014 @ 19:11:04: atom: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
License plate is visible and there is a slim chance that the owner of the truck might pop in with a comment, unlikely maybe but it has happened!
10/04/2014 @ 19:30:10: mike962: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
License plate is visible and there is a slim chance that the owner of the truck might pop in with a comment, unlikely maybe but it has happened!
yep but is based on outside random luck not on anyone's knowlage of trucks
those I mentioned are only some examples, I reckon 3 to 4 pages of this impossible to ID are lurking in the unknown section
10/04/2014 @ 20:07:15: rjluna2: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
Once a great while there may a truck with good identification that is behind. Here is a perfect example that I found this:
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_602174-Ashok-Leyland.html 
11/04/2014 @ 00:35:55: mike962: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
11/04/2014 @ 21:43:25: eLMeR: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
With a touch of patience, a pinch of perseverance and a bit of luck?
So someone can give a possible hint that may (or may not) help more expert people to better identify the make and model of the vehicle.
I tried for this one. For the two others, maybe someone will have one day the opportunity to see the movies and will do the same?
12/04/2014 @ 00:41:44: mike962: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
the big flaw in your theory is the first one is a modern truck
but the other are vintage long nose , even with best frontal view they stay unsolved
otherwise how do you explain 55 pages of unkwnon trucks, realy gi theu them yourself !!
15/04/2014 @ 00:42:15: antp: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
15/04/2014 @ 10:16:33: Gamer: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
No one seems to have noticed that I busted this one a long time ago:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_598612.html18/04/2014 @ 01:42:46: mike962: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
25/06/2014 @ 00:03:54: Purzel89: should "simple trucks" from behind only be deleted , put in comments ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_217919.html
I see a chance of Identification here, Simple Trucks are easier then Trucks with Trailers because some Simple Trucks have unique rear lights like Mercedes-Benz.
