Subject: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
21/03/2007 @ 15:57:40: Ddey65: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
It's seems there are still some cars, trucks, buses, and what not that some of us have successfully identified, but are still listed as unknown. I'll show you two examples by me for starters:


1970-73 Dodge D-Series:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_91628-unknown.html

Hendrickson:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_61929-unknown.html

When I find others, I'll post them here as well.


-----------

Note:
Please report only vehicles which were obviously "missed", i.e. on which a comment was posted more than a few days ago but which were still not yet renamed.
21/03/2007 @ 16:22:24: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Thanks. Sometimes such vehicles are missed by us (though that I try to check all the comments).
Note that my offer to give you admin rights is still valid :wink:
25/03/2007 @ 16:49:37: firebird86: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Thanks. Sometimes such vehicles are missed by us (though that I try to check all the comments).
Note that my offer to give you admin rights is still valid :wink:

Come Ddey, take the plunge :sol:
21/05/2007 @ 15:19:46: Ddey65: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Such a tempting offer. Though I'm not the expert I appear to be, and I'm a little worried that the number of adminstratiors might outnumber users. Anyway, this tractor:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=101208
and this one(on the far-left):
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_75973-International-Harvester-Unknown.html

Both International Harvester-Hough Payloaders.
21/05/2007 @ 15:28:24: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Thanks.
About number of admins, well, it is not a so big problem I think, as long as not anybody becomes admin but just "serious" members. The "problem" is the admins that we do not see anymore on the site: should they still remain in the admin list?
21/05/2007 @ 22:04:05: wickey: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I think taht is not necessary.
21/05/2007 @ 22:10:10: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Well, actually this question should rather be discussed in the admin-only section :whistle:
22/05/2007 @ 12:43:16: garco: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
You can move the topic? :wink:
22/05/2007 @ 20:19:03: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Well, the beginning of the topic should stay here... rather recreate a new one there.
09/07/2007 @ 14:30:31: garco: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Well, where is it? :smile:
09/07/2007 @ 15:21:02: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
The topic for admins? Well, you can create it :tongue:
21/08/2007 @ 05:41:39: Ddey65: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
While were on the topic, here's another non-identified vehicle. A Caterpillar D7 Tractor:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_122635-unknown.html
21/08/2007 @ 09:47:06: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Maybe you edited your message after that I saw it :wink:
01/10/2007 @ 17:16:18: atom: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
A Volvo 440 listed as 340: http://imcdb.org/vehicle_125135-Volvo-340.html
21/10/2007 @ 04:29:00: Ddey65: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Okay, do you see this truck?
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_120919-Dodge-Ram.html

It's not a Ram. It's too old to be a Ram.

30/10/2007 @ 18:13:52: Ddey65: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
A 1969 Ford Custom listed as a 1959:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_135607-Ford-Custom-1959.html

25/11/2007 @ 16:14:09: Ddey65: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Even Stevens:
1950 Dodge Woody Station Wagon from episode 1.20:
http://evenstevens.disneytvzone.com/media/evenstevens/gallery/pictures/season1/2- 0-almost_perfect/img149.jpg


Kim Possible:
Possible Peterbilt 377 in episode 2.27:
http://caps.kpfanworld.com/images/48%20Motor%20Ed%20Pics/PowerDVD%202006-07-06%2014-05-40-40.jpg

Chevrolet Astro in episode 1.15:
http://caps.kpfanworld.com/images/15_All_The_News/122.jpg

The rest of my KP comments:
http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-1069-done_Kim_PossibleLinks.html



An old White-Freightliner in an episode of CHiPs:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_134717-unknown.html

A Mercury Monterey Police Car in "The Gumball Rally":
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=137370


25/11/2007 @ 17:40:55: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
The first links should rather be posted in contributions section.
When you add pics in a topic marked as "[done]", if you do not remove the "done" of the title of first message, we will probably miss it...
25/11/2007 @ 19:23:58: Ddey65: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
The first links should rather be posted in contributions section.
When you add pics in a topic marked as "[done]", if you do not remove the "done" of the title of first message, we will probably miss it...


Ahh, so that's what I did wrong. I take it I can automatically mark one of my two most recent music videos as "[done]" as well. Am I right?


25/11/2007 @ 19:45:28: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
:confused: I do not understand what you mean, but "[done]" in the title of 1st message means that this topic can be "ignored" when we (admins) search for contributions to process/add to the site.
... 170 
Back