For me, besides the fact that this means that we then give links leading to websites that provide what seems to be illegal info, and keeping in mind that I'm not a lawyer (meaning it's just my reading of the texts 
), the real problem is that the IMCDb contributors that use these sites reuse SIV data in their comments (MY can be identified by other means, but engine and trim come directly from the SIV). And a such, the IMCDb should have a license to make it, and we shouldn't display these info publicly:
(I made the underlining)
I don't know how much is the fine for displaying SIV data without the corresponding license. Nor if it's a really deep plunge in the "forbidden zone" (if it ever is) for the IMCDb when displaying these info...
), the real problem is that the IMCDb contributors that use these sites reuse SIV data in their comments (MY can be identified by other means, but engine and trim come directly from the SIV). And a such, the IMCDb should have a license to make it, and we shouldn't display these info publicly:[...] Le bénéficiaire d’une licence peut transférer les données issues du SIV à un autre titulaire de licence aux fins prévues par sa licence. Ce cas de figure ne permet pas une rediffusion « en cascade » à des tiers inconnus du ministère de l’intérieur, c’est-à-dire à des personnes physiques ou morales n’ayant pas obtenu une licence. En effet, tous les réutilisateurs des informations publiques issues du SIV doivent être titulaires d’une licence délivrée par le ministère de l’Intérieur. Le licencié de niveau 2 se limite à un usage strictement interne des données qui lui sont rediffusées. Il ne peut en aucun cas revendre ou rediffuser les données ainsi obtenues.
(I made the underlining)
I don't know how much is the fine for displaying SIV data without the corresponding license. Nor if it's a really deep plunge in the "forbidden zone" (if it ever is) for the IMCDb when displaying these info...
