"ok
you mean, e.g
1.audi a4
2.ford c victoria
3.dodge van...
etc.
right ?"

Yes, that way. It's easier (after an ID for other user) to upload better than the user who has ID the car says (At 00:15:23 it's a...)

And about the way to submit the pics....use the better way for you. As you usually do, the car is better to get a ID for other user who see your post but, I don't know why, lately some of them (later) are broken. Using imageshack thumbnails, it seems, the thumbnails save better in the post but, in the contrary, I suppose others users will not open the image to see them entirely, so... use the better way for you.
Chao

ok
you mean, e.g
1.audi a4
2.ford c victoria
3.dodge van...
etc.
right ?

I put the image direct link for a better and faster view, it's ok or I must to put the thumbnail link ?

http://www.imcdb.org/movie_435528-Whisper.html

Some backgrounds not added: mercedes too part seen and corolla far and little. Cars seen through the window of other cars are too background except if we are speaking about a rare one. Any way some of them have been added because are clares shot.

Better if, now on, you number the vehicles before the thumbnail

just few hours was broken. now I see it good

at 00:10:10
http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/401/unknown001010.jpg

already broken

from time to time some imageshack servers are down. Usually they come back within few hours/day. In rare case pictures disappear forever.

fixed
why this happens ?

Ford Crown Victoria
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/446/1starc.png
at 00:10:37
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/9891/fordcrownvictoria001037.jpg

at 00:45:03
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/5386/unknown004503.jpg

Links broken

thanks

That first unknown car looks to me like a '67 or '68 Plymouth Fury. The last one looks like a 2000+ Chevy Impala.