IMCDb Forum
Delete a Message
Reason of removal (sent to the user)

Do you really want to delete this message?  


Exiv96
Why are there so many JDM cars listed as model origin Japan, made for J? That doesn't make any sense.


Problem with JDM cars is that they are more common on the site in their export version, so we do not often use the made for tag for export versions... hence the interest of the made for J tag on JDM versions.
If someone has a better idea... :grin:
(on the next version of the site, it will be easier to handle - I know I always say that)


Indeed, I'm responsible for that Tercel (and a few other "Made for J"). I know it's ususual and debatable, and I certainly wouldn't put a "Made for F" on a Renault, but my initial logic was this : JDM-spec japanese cars have become, since the 1970s, quite specific themselves when compared to their export versions.

For instance, if we omit the EU-spec rear foglight, some japanese cars look exactly the same in Germany, Hong Kong, Chile or Australia. However, that same car, in JDM-spec, will probably have a different name, or a different grille, or an incredibly convoluted trim level, or that third outside mirror if it's an SUV, and so on.

That's why I started to put a "Made for J" tag on JDM japanese cars, but only when there's another spec elsewhere in the world. I thought I wouldn't put that tag on a Honda Mobilio Spike, for instance, because that one had never been officially exported outside Japan.

But then came those russian series where used JDM-spec cars were often seen, sometimes alongside EU-spec (or even US-spec !) ones. So I thought it would be interesting to reflect that by adding the spec of each vehicle, when known. And that meant adding a "Made for J" on cars which wouldn't get one before.

I know, it's complicated.
Sign In :: Sign Up :: Lost your login or your password?
KelCommunity.be :: © 2004-2024 Akretio SPRL :: Powered by Kelare