I can only surmised you were dropped on your head several times as a baby, or you have some significant learning disorder, because your arguments make only slightly more sense than the success of Nickelback as musicians.

Why is it better for a car to have bad fuel economy? I mean, I'm willing to overlook it if the car is good otherwise, but it's not a good factor. A Ferrari isn't better than a Corvette because it uses more gas.

And why do you constantly remind us of how great the Tempo is, but refuse to accept that anything European is good, when the Tempo (and just about every other Ford in the '80's) was so heavily influenced by *gasp!* European cars?

Oh, and the Mercedes-Benz GL450 is slightly faster than the Escalade, while making you look like slightly less of a self-centred prick for driving one (and yes, they're competitors).

And McDonald's burgers suck. I'm all for junk cuisine, but that doesn't mean having a complete lack of standards.