Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Add this message as quote for multiple quotes

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 15/12/2015 @ 17:53:23, By antp

Quote From: mike962

GMC by default ? as trucks are more associated with trucks rather than Chevy, this one has removed badge

eLMeR started to use GM [GMT530] as name for the unidentifiable ones, as we already have a lot of vehicles listed under the GM make it is not much a problem

eLMeR

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 15/12/2015 @ 21:24:24, By eLMeR

These TopKicks/Kodiaks were still set as unknown when Mike962 wrote his post. Which may explain why he felt so uncomfortable with these pages :wink:

But these changes (and some others) were on my to-do list, so that was just a matter of time before the unknown "identifications" disappear. But as we all know, Mike962 and patience...

Latest Edition: 15/12/2015 @ 21:27:00

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 15/12/2015 @ 22:20:43, By antp

And about the Reo/Jeep/AM General (from the older to the newer), I suggest we take the name based on a year estimation of the vehicle and the movie it appears, probably often by guessing, but to me it is still better than just keeping these as "unknown". It can always be mentioned in the comments that the make is unsure, just for future reference.

eLMeR

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 16/12/2015 @ 02:05:12, By eLMeR

[...] It can always be mentioned in the comments that the make is unsure, just for future reference.

It should be noted each time a default make or model is used, I think. It won't avoid unchecked internal reference by some contributors, but it would at least reflect the facts...
Will there be a "as default identification" field/check-box, in the NextGen?

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 16/12/2015 @ 20:30:39, By antp

Until now usually comments allow to see if it was properly identified or just taken random amongst several names.

About the check box "by default", not yet done, but that would be very easy to add, I'll put it on the to-do list

Latest Edition: 16/12/2015 @ 20:31:12

eLMeR

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 17/12/2015 @ 02:05:03, By eLMeR

Until now usually comments allow to see if it was properly identified or just taken random amongst several names. [...]

Only if the contributor who proposed the vehicle added a comment about it, or if the admin who validated/modified the identification "left a trace". I'm sure a lot of "default identifications" are not so easily visible :wink:

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 17/12/2015 @ 18:43:00, By mike962

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_869766.html

and it's more an off-road category

Latest Edition: 17/12/2015 @ 18:43:19

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=788637
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=871256
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=871143
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=750089

duplicate
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=870588

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 18/12/2015 @ 20:28:00, By mike962

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 19/12/2015 @ 16:58:32, By mike962

Farming vehicle
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_473665-Caterpillar-D-Series.html

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 20/12/2015 @ 23:41:39, By mike962

this needs a correction according to sales brochure
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_349077-Flextrac-Nodwell.html

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 21/12/2015 @ 10:42:15, By antp

Quote From: mike962

Farming vehicle
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_473665-Caterpillar-D-Series.html

I don't really see why

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 21/12/2015 @ 17:03:42, By mike962

I don't really see why

see the thumbnail
http://pics.imcdb.org/13592/snapshot20151210190723.26.jpg

this machine is basically a seed-drill
http://www.pamf.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/seed-drill.jpg

it has at rear bulldozer ripper like this

http://www.industrialbuckets.com/Fotos/Attachment/Dozer_Ripper/RD6H/1_op_800x603- .jpg
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xCx6QH5J7jc/hqdefault.jpg

and from the top come the seeds down in the small trench dog by ripper

Latest Edition: 21/12/2015 @ 17:07:22

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 21/12/2015 @ 18:24:09, By antp

Indeed; I thought it was just a dumper on tracks

Latest Edition: 21/12/2015 @ 18:24:28

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 21/12/2015 @ 19:55:14, By mike962

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 21/12/2015 @ 20:30:25, By mike962

and this can be classified as Made for Movie ?
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=871722

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 21/12/2015 @ 22:28:02, By antp

For http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=871911 I'm not so sure; it looks similar but a little different too

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 22/12/2015 @ 16:09:36, By mike962

For http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=871911 I'm not so sure; it looks similar but a little different too

is this alright ?
http://www.fire-engine-photos.com/picture/number408

filmed in Finland, Sisuis a finnish producer, rear window and body is identidcal

also a MIS-ID here
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=257482

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 22/12/2015 @ 16:22:25, By antp

For the make I believe you, as I guess there aren't many others that could look similar indeed, but that other one you give as proof is another model :tongue:

SB 140 vs SB 127...
(or do you mean then that it is 140 instead of the 127 originally given?)

Latest Edition: 22/12/2015 @ 16:26:28

Gamer

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 22/12/2015 @ 18:57:22, By Gamer

I've finally decided to return. :grin:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=696639

You can list this as Piaggio Vespa, one entry for both:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=336715

MBK Skyliner:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=846884

Mis-IDs:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=325916
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=51680
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=812964
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_374712-Peugeot-Trekker.html

Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Published 22/12/2015 @ 20:23:52, By mike962